Sometimes I change my mind about buildings. This is a good example. I first saw Bishopstone station about 15 years ago, and I didn’t like it. It was so run-down that I couldn’t see past the neglect and decay to the quality of the building underneath. I wrote the article below in 2013, still discomfited.
In the last few years I’ve realised it’s actually a very good little building, by an architect who has slowly become my favourite railway architect as I’ve discovered his other stations. It took until the work of the Sussex Community Rail Partnership (at first) and the Friends of Bishopstone Station (more recently) to begin to breathe life and spirit back into Bishopstone. They’ve installed artworks on the platform and in the booking hall, and cleared the weeds away from the disused platform. They have ambitious plans, which will take many years to realise, to fully restore the station building and re-open its disused spaces for the community. And when they do, I think they will have a little gem on their hands. I still think the pill-boxes spoil the lines of the building, but I guess I’m just going to have to learn to love them too, as part of the station’s history…
DW, January 2019.
I knew this would happen.
The world of transport writing is such that most of us who do it have a degree of cynicism about us. There’s only so many times you can watch a government u-turn over rail franchising policy, or hear about a “new” transport investment which has already been announced several times before, or witness the launch of a feasibility study into something that has already been implemented extensively in other countries around the world, before you get slightly less positive than you might like to be.
And I knew that before long someone, instead of suggesting a beautiful subject for The Beauty of Transport, would instead suggest that I look at the opposite. So it’s time for a trip to the seaside, and Bishopstone railway station in East Sussex, UK.
Says a friend: “Visually, it always reminds me of a World War 2 submachine gun nest on a Normandy cliff. The ambience is even worse – and that’s being nice about it.”
Here’s the photo then:
It’s a bit of shocker, isn’t it? And bear in mind that sunlight always flatters a building. Imagine the station during a thunderstorm, silhouetted against a slate-dark sky by a jagged fork of lightning…
On the branch line to the coastal town of Seaford, and just metres away from the coastline itself, Bishopstone station was built in 1936 to serve a housing estate at the west end of Seaford. It was built by the Guildhall Development Company in the Southern Railway’s pre-war Art Deco ‘Odeon style’ (subject of an upcoming blog entry), and although unstated would have been by the Southern Railway’s then architect James Robb Scott. The double height ticket hall has an octagonal plan, which is unusual but not unknown – the Southern Railway also built an octagonal building at Hastings, which has since been lost. But the addition of what look for all the world like gun emplacements on the roof lends a very unsettling quality to the building.
For such a scary-looking building, it is perhaps surprising to find that it is listed by English Heritage at Grade II. English Heritage says the, “Design closely follows stations by Charles Holden for London Transport e.g. Arnos Grove and Bounds Green”, but I assume English Heritage hadn’t in this case taken too much notice of what Holden’s stations actually looked like, as the proportions are all wrong for a Holden station.
The station’s current none-too-luxurious ambience is largely a result of the station building being old and high maintenance, having been designed in an era when there were plenty of staff about to keep stations clean and well maintained. Bishopstone station is now unstaffed, and has been since the late 1980s. It’s far from unique in this regard, and reduced (or non-existent) staffing levels and attempts to reduce the cost of operating the UK railway mean that hard-to-clean older buildings get grubby surprisingly quickly. When they spring a leak, or something falls off, or plants start growing out of the brickwork, it can be expensive to sort out, so such buildings get neglected, which makes matters worse. There’s a debate to be had as to whether the best solution is:
- to retain older station buildings even where staffing levels are such that they will never look their best, or
- for the railway industry to spend a lot of money rectifying what has often been decades of insufficient maintenance (money that passengers will grumble is being added to the price of their tickets), or
- to knock down a problematic old building and replace it with something modern which operators know they can keep clean and tidy for the money they actually expect to have available (which is what happened to Hastings station). At which point the heritage lobby and/or the railway enthusiast lobby will probably get upset, or
- do something else. Like turn your old station into a palm house. Or a pub. Or a guest house.
The reduction of the track from double line to single line on the Seaford branch line hasn’t helped Bishopstone’s ambience either, with the old eastbound platform standing disused and weed-infested (an issue that could be sorted out with some weedkiller, but how could a hard-headed business justify the expense?)
But while station ambience is generally a function of the money you have to spend maintaining, cleaning, lighting and heating a station, there’s less that can be done (short of demolition) to change the shape of a building if it looks a bit scary, as Bishopstone station does. And this is where Bishopstone station’s story gets interesting. Because, curiously, the reason it looks like a submachine gun nest is that it actually is a submachine gun nest.
At the beginning of the Second World War there was considerable concern that a Nazi invasion would land on either the east or south coasts of Britain. Places like Bishopstone – a shallow beach fronting low-lying land, were considered particularly vulnerable to invasion. And so, in 1940, a pair of pillboxes were added to the roof of the then-new station, attached to either side of the octagonal central tower, resulting in a building that looks exactly like what it is – a gun emplacement. It is at least honest, unlike so many buildings. The height of the station and the angle of the pillboxes gave a good range of coverage, and had there been an invasion, this is one of the structures from where it would have been resisted.
As far as I can tell from the listing record, it’s the similarity to Holden’s Arnos Grove/Bounds Green London Underground stations and the addition of the pillboxes (!) that are the particular points of interest justifying Bishopstone station’s Grade II status. Amazing. But perhaps fitting.
If it’s a scary-looking building, it’s scary-looking for a good reason. It was designed for a different world, to scare off potential invaders. Perhaps it’s not so beastly after all.
The National Heritage List for England, entry for Bishopstone station (here)
This entry was the result of a suggestion…
A friend suggested I take a look at Bishopstone Station (thank you!) for inclusion on this blog. So I did, and I did. I like getting suggestions and recommendations. If there’s something you think I should be covering on the beauty of transport, drop me a line: see the “contact the author” tab.
4 thoughts on “War Baby (Bishopstone station, East Sussex, UK)”
I note with a great deal of interest on your comments of Bishopstone station.
A new group called Friends of Bishopstone Station are working along side Sussex community rail partnership with the aim of trying to refurbish for use as a community space. Plus look after the unused platform.
We are adopting this station this weekend with a poppy display and silent soldiers.
This will take years but we think it’s worth it.